// 01 · critic
Baldwin
technical risk, lock-in, sequencing — the master's tools.
a council convenes · on the question of whether to adopt
Dreamcatcher
Four voices. One question.
does this tool, at this moment, serve the community it claims to — and reach the ones it doesn't?
baldwin — murray — rustin — rivera
the critic, the ethicist, the builder, the inclusion judge. rivera asks who the tool is not for. a fifth — newton — joins for cross-org co-build in phase three.
// submit a tool
Summon the Council
paste a url. the council will read it against the living wishlist + guardrails.
each evaluation asks four personas, in parallel, to hold this tool against blkout's living wishlist. it takes 15–40 seconds. every verdict joins the shared history. rivera carries a standing veto on any catch that leaves the under-served on the street.
// the council convenes
baldwin sharpens the question. murray opens the guardrails. rustin checks the stack. rivera asks who's on the street.
// the council's verdict
// 02 · ethicist
Murray
values, sovereignty, community benefit.
// 03 · builder
Rustin
vibe-codeability, stack fit, lift — what'll actually ship.
// 04 · inclusion
Rivera
reach, the under-served, who's on the street.
// 05 · collaborator · phase three
Newton — coming when the demand signal is there.
named for huey p. newton. reads across the corpus of partner submissions and surfaces co-build opportunities — when three or more orgs ask the same question, newton names a shared answer.